Citation

Moore M, McKee M, Daube M. J. Public Health Policy 2016; 37(4): 403-410.

Affiliation

Curtin University, Perth, Australia.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group -- Palgrave-Macmillan)

DOI

10.1057/s41271-016-0031-2

PMID

28202930

Abstract

Some supporters of electronic cigarettes have argued that they should be considered a form of harm reduction, analogous to that which has been successful with narcotics. In this viewpoint, we contend that this argument is based on highly selective use of the evidence, coupled with a fundamental misunderstanding of a comprehensive harm minimisation strategy. This includes not only harm reduction but also reduction in demand and supply-two elements that are explicitly rejected by many advocates of electronic cigarettes. We contend that, in the absence of all three elements, there is a danger that electronic cigarettes will delay the achievement of a tobacco-free world.

Language: en

Keywords

electronic cigarettes; harm reduction; smoking; tobacco control; tobacco endgame