SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Spildooren J, Vercruysse S, Heremans E, Galna B, Verheyden G, Vervoort G, Nieuwboer A. J. Neurol. Phys. Ther. 2017; 41(2): 129-135.

Affiliation

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Belgium (S.J., V.S., H.E., V.G., V.G., N.A.); Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Hasselt University, Belgium (S.J.); and Institute of Neuroscience/Newcastle University Institute for Ageing, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom (G.B.).

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Neurology Section, American Physical Therapy Association)

DOI

10.1097/NPT.0000000000000178

PMID

28263251

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Individuals with Parkinson disease exhibit decreased axial head-pelvis rotation. Consequently, they turn more en bloc than healthy controls, which may contribute to freezing during turning. We wanted to understand the influence of auditory cueing and an attentional strategy on turning and how this related to freezing of gait (FOG).

METHODS: Fifteen participants with Parkinson disease and FOG were asked to turn 180° during baseline condition, unilateral cueing, and an attentional strategy prompting to start the turn with head rotation first. FOG occurrence, axial rotation, center of mass (COM) deviation, knee-flexion amplitude, and total turn velocity were measured using 3D motion analysis while off-medication. Normal reference values were obtained from 14 age-matched controls.

RESULTS: Thirty-nine FOG episodes occurred in 5 participants. FOG occurred in 52.8% of baseline trials compared with 34.6% of trials using the head-first strategy, and 3.8% of the auditory cueing trials. During the head first strategy, the initiation of head, trunk, and pelvic rotation as well as the head-pelvis separation resembled turning patterns of healthy controls, but the COM shift to the inside of the turn was exaggerated. By contrast, during cueing, turning became more en bloc, with decreased head-pelvis separation and knee-flexion amplitude.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Cueing reduced FOG but did not correct axial movement deficits. The head-first strategy improved head-pelvis dissociation but had only limited effects on FOG. These results suggest that axial and COM deviation impairments are not directly related to FOG but may rather indicate a compensatory mechanism. Cueing reinforced the en-bloc movement and might as such help prevent FOG by triggering an alternative neural mechanism for movement generation.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A163).


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print