Citation

Lindheimer TE, Fitzpatrick K, Avelar R, Miles JD. Transp. Res. Rec. 2017; 2616: 10-18.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences USA, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.3141/2616-02

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Chapter 3 in the 2004 AASHTO high-occupancy-vehicle guidelines includes a prioritized trade-off table of various design options for high-occupancy-vehicle lanes (now known as managed lanes). The design trade-offs include the reduction of lane, shoulder, or buffer width. The key measure thought to be affected by lane, shoulder, and buffer width is lateral position. The presented study identified the relationship between operations and cross-section width, including the type of buffer design separating the managed lanes from the general-purpose lanes. This research study collected lateral position data on existing managed lane facilities with a range of geometric elements within both tangent and horizontal curves and identified potential relationships between the geometric design element values and the measure of effectiveness. The field studies included data collected at 28 sites with fixed video cameras and along 161 centerline miles with an instrumented vehicle that recorded data for the vehicle immediately in front of the instrumented vehicle. The study found that managed-lane drivers shifted away from the pylons placed in the buffer. Horizontal alignment (tangent or curve) and the direction of the horizontal curve (left or right) influenced lateral position. Left shoulder, lane, and buffer width affected lateral position. Modifying a 6.5-ft shoulder to a minimum shoulder (i.e., 1.5 ft) will result in drivers moving to the right about 0.5 ft; however, if an 18.5-ft shoulder is reduced by 5 ft, the impact in operations is negligible (drivers would shift only about 0.11 ft toward the right).

Language: en