SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Kamenov K, Cabello M, Nieto M, Bernard R, Kohls E, Rummel-Kluge C, Ayuso-Mateos JL. Front. Psychol. 2017; 8: e356.

Affiliation

Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red, CIBERMadrid, Spain; Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de MadridMadrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación de La Princesa (IIS-IP), Hospital Universitario de La PrincesaMadrid, Spain.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Frontiers Research Foundation)

DOI

10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00356

PMID

28337167

PMCID

PMC5343004

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the steadily escalating psychological and economic burden of depression, there is a lack of evidence for the effectiveness of available interventions on functioning areas beyond symptomatology. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to give an insight into the current measurement of treatment effectiveness in depression and to provide recommendations for its improvement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was based on a multi-informant approach, comparing data from a systematic literature review, an expert survey with representatives from clinical practice (130), and qualitative interviews with patients (11) experiencing depression.

RESULTS: Current literature places emphasis on symptomatic outcomes and neglects other domains of functioning, whereas clinicians and depressed patients highlight the importance of both. Interpersonal relationships, recreation and daily activities, communication, social participation, work difficulties were identified as being crucial for recovery. Personal factors, neglected by the literature, such as self-efficacy were introduced by experts and patients. Furthermore, clinicians and patients identified a number of differences regarding the areas improved by psychotherapeutic or pharmacological interventions that were not addressed by the pertinent literature.

CONCLUSION: Creation of a new cross-nationally applicable measure of psychosocial functioning, broader remission criteria, report of domain-specific information, and a personalized approach in treatment decision-making are the first crucial steps needed for the improvement of the measurement of treatment effectiveness in depression. A better measurement will facilitate the clinical decision making and answer the escalating burden of depression.


Language: en

Keywords

depression; functioning; intervention; outcome measure; treatment effectiveness

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print