SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Beauchamp MH, Landry-Roy C, Gravel J, Beaudoin C, Bernier A. J. Neurotrauma 2017; 34(17): 2545-2552.

Affiliation

University of Montreal, Psychology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada ; annie.bernier@umontreal.ca.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Mary Ann Liebert Publishers)

DOI

10.1089/neu.2016.4868

PMID

28398160

Abstract

Pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) research depends on comparisons of profiles and outcome between brain injured individuals and groups consisting either of injured controls (e.g., orthopedic injuries, OI) or uninjured, typically developing children recruited from the community (community controls, CC). Children with OI are thought to provide optimal comparisons for individuals with TBI because they share injury-related experiences and pre-morbid characteristics; however, a study by Mathias and colleagues (2013) in adults has called into question the added value of injury control groups in TBI research. The comparability of these control groups has not been established in young children. 72 children with OI and 84 CC aged between 18 and 60 months were compared on a range of demographic variables, developmental and medical history, pre-injury behavioral and adaptive profiles, as well as on measures of adaptive functioning, behavior, family functioning, post-concussive symptoms and cognition (intellectual functioning, verbal abilities, executive functioning, social cognition) six months after the OI. There were no statistically significant differences between the OI and CC groups on any of the variables tested, whether they related to pre-injury or post-injury characteristics. The findings are applicable to studies seeking to identify appropriate control groups in the context of preschool TBI research, and suggest no clear advantage in recruiting OI controls based on the variables studied and the methodology used. However, further work is necessary to verify additional factors and outcomes relevant to pediatric TBI research, as well as to compare outcome between these two groups at more acute stages (i.e. prior to 6 months post-injury).


Language: en

Keywords

OUTCOME MEASURES; PEDIATRIC BRAIN INJURY; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print