Citation

Johal J, Ward R, Gielecki J, Walocha J, Natsis K, Tubbs RS, Loukas M. Clin. Anat. 2017; 30(6): 767-773.

Affiliation

Department of Anatomical Sciences, St. George's University, School of Medicine Grenada, West Indies.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/ca.22899

PMID

28509358

Abstract

The issue of predatory journals has become increasingly more prevalent over the past decade, as the open-access model of publishing has gained prominence. Although the open-access model is well-intentioned to increase accessibility of biomedical research, it is vulnerable to exploitation by those looking to corrupt medical academia and circumvent ethics and research standards. Predatory journals will achieve publication by either soliciting unsuspecting researchers who have legitimate research but fall victim to these predators, or researchers looking to quickly publish their research without a thorough review process. Some features of predatory journals are a quick non peer-review process, falsely listing or exaggerating the credibility of editorial board members, and either lack of or falsification of institutional affiliations and database listings. These predatory journals are a serious threat to the integrity of medical research, as they will infect the available literature with unsubstantiated papers, and allow the low-quality publication research. A number of steps can be taken to prevent the spread and increase awareness of predatory publishers, and these must be done to maintain the integrity of medical academia. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Language: en

Keywords

biomedical research; open access publishing; peer review; publishing