Citation

Patel K, Watanabe-Galloway S, Gofin R, Haynatzki G, Rautiainen R. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2017; 60(7): 599-620.

Affiliation

Department of Environmental, Agricultural, and Occupational Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Public Health, Omaha, Nebraska.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/ajim.22720

PMID

28616885

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently, surveillance of non-fatal agricultural injuries in the U.S. mainly relies on national surveys, and to date, none of these surveys were formally reviewed. Our objective was to review and evaluate these survey-based systems, to identify critical gaps in them and provide recommendations to improve them.

METHODS: We used the updated Center for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines to describe each system and evaluate each system's attributes like simplicity, flexibility, data quality, timeliness, representativeness, etc.

RESULTS: Four adult and two youth national surveys collected data for non-fatal agricultural injuries in the U.S. The evaluation identified three major gaps: 1) insufficient data quality attributed to non-response, measurement errors, and underreporting; 2) untimeliness of data; and 3) lack of flexibility to integrate with other existing systems.

CONCLUSION: Improving data quality, timeliness and flexibility will provide reliable and valid injury estimates, and increase the usefulness of these surveys for surveillance and prevention of farm injuries.

© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Language: en

Keywords

United States; agricultural; non-fatal injury; surveillance; survey