SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Meyer J, Sheridan TB. Hum. Factors 2017; 59(6): 901-910.

Affiliation

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lexington.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0018720817698616

PMID

28796971

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We address the question of necessary conditions for users to adjust system settings, such as alarm thresholds, correctly.

BACKGROUND: When designing systems, we need to decide which system functions users should control. Giving control to users empowers them, but users must have the relevant information and the ability to adjust settings correctly for their control to be beneficial.

METHOD: Using the example of adjusting an alerting threshold, we analyze the conditions for when users can and when they cannot possibly adjust threshold settings adequately.

RESULTS: We identify two obstacles that limit users' ability to adjust thresholds adequately: (a) the difficulty of determining the correct threshold settings, especially because of users' strong response to false positive indications, and (b) the difficulty of collecting the information necessary for setting the threshold.

CONCLUSION: Users often cannot identify the optimal settings for a system, so it is unlikely that they choose adequate system settings. APPLICATION: System designers must consider the difficulties users face and analyze them explicitly when deciding on user involvement in processes.


Language: en

Keywords

alarm systems; decision making; signal detection theory; user control

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print