Citation

Carbajal JM, Gamboa JL, Moore J, Smith F, Ann Eads L, Clothier JL, Caceda R. Psychiatry Res. 2017; 258: 365-373.

Affiliation

Psychiatric Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA. Electronic address: rcaceda@uams.edu.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.psychres.2017.08.071

PMID

28888697

Abstract

Suicidal behavior is frequently triggered by social crises, such as familial, romantic, social or work-related conflict. A variety of cognitive and social functioning impairments has been associated with suicidal thoughts and acts. One of the precipitating and perpetuating factors of social conflict is the desire for retribution after a perceived offense, even at one's own detriment. We utilized the Ultimatum Game-a behavioral economic task which examines the behavioral response to perceived unfairness-in order to characterize the response to unfairness across the acute suicide risk spectrum. We examined five groups of adult individuals of both genders (n = 204): High- and Low-Lethality recent Suicide Attempters, Suicidal Ideators, Non-Suicidal Depressed Patients; and Healthy Controls. We also measured demographic and clinical variables. Even though all depressed groups showed similar rejection rates in the Ultimatum Game, there was a higher likelihood of rejecting offers in the low stakes condition in all acutely suicidal groups compared with healthy controls. Stake size, offer, education, and gender of the proposer were significantly associated with rejection rates. Acutely suicidal patients may be more vulnerable to adverse interpersonal interactions. Further characterization of social behavior may provide targets for secondary and tertiary prevention for high-risk individuals.

Published by Elsevier B.V.

Language: en

Keywords

Decision making; Depression; Fairness; Inpatient; Psychological distress; Social behavior; Suicide