SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Barrett S. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2017; 12(10): 1285-1287.

Affiliation

Department of Sport, Health and Exercise Science, The University of Hull, Kingston Upon Hull, UK.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Human Kinetics Publishers)

DOI

10.1123/ijspp.2016-0516

PMID

28253042

Abstract

PURPOSE: The principle aim of the study was to assess the validity of measuring locomotor activities and PlayerLoad using Real-Time (RT) data collection during soccer training.

METHODS: Twenty-nine (n=29) English soccer players participated. Each player wore the same MEMS device (S5, Optimeye, CatapultSports, Melbourne, Australia) during twenty-one training sessions (n= 331 data sets) in the 2015/2016 and 2016/2017 season. A Real-Time receiver (TRX, Catapultsports, Melbourne, Australia) was used to collect the locomotor activities and PlayerLoad data in RT and compared with the post-event downloaded (PED) data. PlayerLoad and locomotor activities (total distance covered, TDC; total high speed running distance covered, >5.5m/s, HSR; total sprinting distance covered, >7m/s, SP; maximum velocity, VEL) were analysed.

RESULTS: Correlations were near perfect for all variables analysed (r=0.98-1.00), with a varied level of noise between RT and PED also (0.3-9.7% CV).

CONCLUSIONS: Locomotor activities and PlayerLoad can be used both RT and PED concurrently to quantify a players physical output during a training session. Caution should be taken with higher velocity based locomotor activities during RT compared to PED.


Language: en

Keywords

Locomotor Activities; MEMS devices; PlayerLoad; Technology; Training

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print