Citation

Derges J, Kidger J, Fox F, Campbell R, Kaner E, Taylor G, McMahon C, Reeves L, Hickman M. J. Public Health (Oxford) 2018; 40(2): 381-388.

Affiliation

School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 4TP, UK.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Oxford University Press)

DOI

10.1093/pubmed/fdx090

PMID

28977388

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention (ASBI) helps reduce risky drinking in adults, but less is known about its effectiveness with young people. This article explores implementation of DrinkThink, an ASBI co-produced with young people, by health, youth and social care professionals trained in its delivery.

METHODS: A qualitative evaluation was conducted using focus groups with 33 staff trained to deliver DrinkThink, and eight interviews with trained participants and service managers. These were recorded, transcribed and a thematic analysis undertaken.

RESULTS: DrinkThink was not delivered fully by health, youth or social care agencies. The reasons for this varied by setting but included: the training staff received, a working culture that was ill-suited to the intervention, staff attitudes towards alcohol which prioritized other health problems presented by young people, over alcohol use.

CONCLUSIONS: Implementation was limited because staff had not been involved in the design and planning of DrinkThink. Staffs' perceptions of alcohol problems in young people and the diverse cultures in which they work were subsequently not accounted for in the design. Co-producing youth focused ASBIs with the professionals expected to deliver them, and the young people whom they target, may ensure greater success in integrating them into working practice.

Language: en

Keywords

alcohol screening and brief intervention; co-production; facilitators and barriers; implementation