SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

de Koning ME, Scheenen ME, van der Horn HJ, Timmerman ME, Hageman G, Roks G, Spikman JM, van der Naalt J. Neurology 2017; 89(18): 1908-1914.

Affiliation

From the Department of Neurology (M.E.d.K., H.J.v.d.H., J.v.d.N.), Department of Neuropsychology (M.E.S., J.M.S.), and Department of Psychometrics and Statistics (M.E.T.), University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen; Department of Neurology (G.H.), Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede; and Department of Neurology (G.R.), Elisabeth Tweesteden Hospital Tilburg, the Netherlands. j.van.der.naalt@umcg.nl.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

10.1212/WNL.0000000000004604

PMID

28986414

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study return to work (RTW) after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) at several intervals after injury and to predict RTW on the basis of occupational factors in addition to demographic, personality, and injury-related factors at 6 and 12 months after injury.

METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study (UPFRONT study, n = 1,151) of patients with mTBI admitted to the emergency department. Patients received questionnaires at 2 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months after injury. RTW was divided into 3 levels: complete (cRTW), partial (pRTW), and no RTW.

RESULTS: Rates of cRTW increased from 34% at 2 weeks to 77% at 12 months after injury, pRTW varied from 8% to 16% throughout the year. Logistic regression (complete vs incomplete RTW) demonstrated that apart from previously identified predictors such as demographics (e.g., age and education) and injury characteristics (e.g., cause and severity of injury) and indicators of psychological distress, occupational factors were of influence on work resumption after 6 months (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.82), At 12 months, however, the model was based solely on the presence of extracranial injuries and indicators of maladaptation after injury (AUC = 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS: RTW after mTBI is a gradual process, with varying levels of RTW throughout the first year after injury. Different predictors were relevant for short- vs long-term work resumption, with occupational factors influencing short-term RTW. However, for both short- and long-term RTW, posttraumatic complaints and signs of psychological distress early after injury were relevant predictors, allowing early identification of patients at risk for problematic work resumption.

© 2017 American Academy of Neurology.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print