SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Gotlib Conn L, Zwaiman A, DasGupta T, Hales B, Watamaniuk A, Nathens AB. Injury 2018; 49(1): 97-103.

Affiliation

Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Trauma, Emergency and Critical Care Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto ON Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto ON Canada. Electronic address: avery.nathens@sunnybrook.ca.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.injury.2017.09.028

PMID

28988066

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Challenges delivering quality care are especially salient during hospital discharge and care transitions. Severely injured patients discharged from a trauma centre will go either home, to rehabilitation or another acute care hospital with complex management needs. This purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of trauma patients and families treated in a regional academic trauma centre to better understand and improve their discharge and care transition experiences.

METHODS: A qualitative study using inductive thematic analysis was conducted between March and October 2016. Telephone interviews were conducted with trauma patients and/or a family member after discharge from the trauma centre. Data collection and analysis were completed inductively and iteratively consistent with a qualitative approach.

RESULTS: Twenty-four interviews included 19 patients and 7 family members. Participants' experiences drew attention to discharge and transfer processes that either (1) Fostered quality discharge or (2) Impeded quality discharge. Fostering quality discharge was ward staff preparation efforts; establishing effective care continuity; and, adequate emotional support. Impeding discharge quality was perceived pressure to leave the hospital; imposed transfer decisions; and, sub-optimal communication and coordination around discharge. Patient-provider communication was viewed to be driven by system, rather than patient need. Inter-facility information gaps raised concern about receiving facilities' ability to care for injured patients.

CONCLUSIONS: The quality of trauma patient discharge and transition experiences is undermined by system- and ward-level processes that compete, rather than align, in producing high quality patient-centred discharge. Local improvement solutions focused on modifiable factors within the trauma centre include patient-oriented discharge education and patient navigation; however, these approaches alone may be insufficient to enhance patient experiences. Trauma patients encounter complex barriers to quality discharge that likely require a comprehensive, multimodal intervention.

Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

Care transfer; Discharge; Injured patients; Patient experience; Qualitative research; Quality improvement; Trauma centre

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print