SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Nelson LD, Furger RE, Ranson J, Tarima S, Hammeke TA, Randolph C, Barr WB, Guskiewicz KK, Olsen CM, Lerner EB, McCrea M. J. Neurotrauma 2018; 35(2): 249-259.

Affiliation

Medical College of Wisconsin, Neurosurgery, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States ; mmccrea@mcw.edu.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Mary Ann Liebert Publishers)

DOI

10.1089/neu.2017.4988

PMID

29017409

Abstract

There is a subset of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) that report persistent symptoms that impair their functioning and quality of life. Being able to predict which patients will experience prolonged symptom recovery would help clinicians target resources for clinical follow-up to those most in need and would facilitate research to develop precision medicine treatments for mTBI. The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictors of symptom recovery in a prospective sample of emergency department trauma patients with either mTBI or non-mTBI injuries. Subjects were examined at several time points from within 72 hours to 45 days post-injury. We quantified and compared the value of a variety of demographic, injury, and clinical assessment (symptom, neurocognitive) variables for predicting self-reported symptom duration in both mTBI (n = 89) and trauma control (n = 73) patients. Several injury-related and neuropsychological variables assessed acutely (< 72 hours) post-injury predicted symptom duration, particularly loss of consciousness (mTBI group), acute somatic symptom burden (both groups), and acute reaction time (both groups), with reasonably good model fit when including all of these variables (AUC =.76). Incorporating self-reported litigation involvement modestly increased prediction further (AUC =.80). The results highlight the multifactorial nature of mTBI recovery, and injury recovery more generally, and the need to incorporate a variety of variables to achieve adequate prediction. Further research to improve this model and validate it in new and more diverse trauma samples will be useful to build a neurobiopsychosocial model of recovery that informs treatment development.


Language: en

Keywords

BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENTS; HEAD TRAUMA; HUMAN STUDIES; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; OUTCOME MEASURES

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print