SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Zhang X, Liu T, He N, Jia G. Int. J. Crashworthiness 2017; 22(4): 377-393.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/13588265.2016.1270495

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

We evaluated two numerical modelling methods based on different modelling scales in simulating the ballistic performance of composite laminates. An orthogonal continuous material model was developed and used to establish an equivalent macro-scale impact model of a projectile/composite target (uniform model). Combining the Chang-Chang failure model and tiebreak contact algorithm, the corresponding computational model for the cross-plied microstructure of composite laminates was constructed layer by layer (layered model). Using the two modelling methods mentioned earlier, a series of ballistic impact simulations were carried out for Kevlar/epoxy composite laminates, and the simulation results were compared with the corresponding experimental results. The computational capacities of the two methods were compared in terms of damage pattern, ballistic limit, residual velocity and computational efficiency. The results indicate that the uniform model can simulate the main ballistic impact behaviour of composite materials, whereas the layered model can simulate more detailed features of composite damage. Moreover, the predictive capability of the uniform model for ballistic limit and residual velocity is equivalent to that of the layered model, and the uniform model exhibits a higher computational efficiency than the layered model.


Language: en

Keywords

ballistic impact; composite laminates; numerical modelling method; Orthotropic material model

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print