SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Price O, Baker J, Bee P, Grundy A, Scott A, Butler D, Cree L, Lovell K. J. Adv. Nurs. 2018; 74(3): 614-625.

Affiliation

Mental Health Nursing, University of Manchester, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/jan.13488

PMID

29082552

Abstract

AIM: Investigate patient perspectives on barriers and enablers to the use and effectiveness of de-escalation techniques for aggression in mental health settings.

BACKGROUND: De-escalation techniques are the recommended first-line intervention for the management of aggression in mental health settings internationally, yet use of higher-risk restrictive practices persists. This indicates de-escalation techniques are not used at optimum frequency and/or there are important factors limiting their use and effect.

DESIGN: Descriptive qualitative research using semi-structured interviews and Framework Analysis.

METHODS: Inpatient interviews (N=26) exploring staff, patient and environmental factors influencing the use and effectiveness of staff de-escalation were conducted mid-2014. Three service user researchers led analysis.

RESULTS: Data were synthesized in three deductive themes relating to staff, patient and environmental influences on the use and effectiveness of de-escalation techniques. The dominant view was that restrictive practices, rather than de-escalation techniques, are used in response to escalating patient behavior. Under-use of de-escalation techniques was attributed to: lack of staff reflection on culture and practice and a need to retain control/dominance over patients. Ward rules, patient factors and a lack of staff respect for patients diluted their effectiveness. Participants' identified a systematic process of de-escalation, rule subversion, reduced social distance and staff authenticity as enablers of effective de-escalation.

CONCLUSION: This study investigated patient perspectives on staff, patient and environmental influences on the use and effectiveness of de-escalation techniques. Our framework of barriers and enablers provides indicators of organizational/behavior change targets for interventions seeking to reduce violence and restrictive practices through enhanced de-escalation techniques. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

aggression; communication; de-escalation techniques; mental health; nursing; patient and public involvement; qualitative; restrictive practices; safety; violence

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print