|
Affiliation
|
The Graduate School, University of Santo Tomas, Tomas Aquinas Research Complex, España Boulevard, Sampaloc, Manila, NCR, 1015 Philippines. |
|
Abstract
|
OBJECTIVE: Few studies demonstrate how the index trauma may influence subsequent post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, especially among soldiers. There is still no consensus on specific trauma types and their corresponding PTSD symptom profiles. Furthermore, varied PTSD symptom manifestations that may yield to PTSD trauma subtypes are yet to be known. Importantly, the significance of the military culture's possible influence on soldiers' PTSD has also been underexplored. And the dominant PTSD construct may possibly be unable to capture the essential aspects of the military context in understanding combat-related PTSD. Hence, this study aims to reach an understanding into how index trauma and military culture may possibly shape participants' PTSD expressions. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Case study design was used, wherein multiple sources of data-such as PTSD assessments, and interviews with the participants and key informants-enabled data triangulation. The three case reports are the outcomes of the corroboration of evidences that reveal an enriched and holistic understanding of the phenomenon under study. The Ethics Review Board Committee of the Armed Forces of the Philippines Medical Center approved the study. The participants were three Filipino active duty combat soldiers.
RESULTS: Although all participants had similar index traumas, their PTSD symptom expressions are unique from one another, in that they differ in terms of their most incapacitating PTSD symptoms and other symptoms that have been potentially shaped by military culture. Their most incapacitating symptoms: hypervigilance (case 1), negative belief in oneself and negative emotions (case 2), prolonged distress, and marked physiological reactions to trauma-related cues (case 3), may be understood in the light of how they personally experienced different circumstances of their index traumas. The way participants have anchored specific components of their sworn soldier's creed (i.e., not leaving a fallen comrade) into some of their PTSD symptoms (i.e., feeling guilty for the comrade's death) may be understood in the light of their military culture and how they were personally traumatized by the details of their index traumas.
CONCLUSION: The participants' index trauma and military culture potentially shaped their PTSD symptom expressions that were distinct from one another. The details of the index trauma, including the level of exposure and proximity; and the salience of military culture, such as the soldier's creed, are important elements into understanding how participants experience their PTSD. Limitations of the study include findings that do not give causal interpretations, use of self-report measures, retrospective accounts from interviews, and participants who are all Filipino active soldiers and enlisted army military personnel. Nevertheless, the study provides an enriched and holistic understanding of personal experiences of soldiers with combat-related PTSD. The findings may inform tailored treatments to soldiers whose experiences may be similar to the settings and concepts discovered in the study. Possible clinical and treatment implications were provided in the study. Future researchers may explore on: possible existence of PTSD subtypes within combat-related PTSD category, other facets of military culture that may mitigate or influence PTSD symptoms, and potential roles of index trauma and military culture using national representative samples.
Reprint & Copyright © 2017 Association of Military Surgeons of the U.S.
Language: en |