Citation

Liu HC, Cheng Y. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2018; 60(4): e193-e198.

Affiliation

Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

10.1097/JOM.0000000000001233

PMID

29135836

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare psychosocial work conditions and health status between public and private sector employees and to examine if psychosocial work conditions explained the health differences.

METHODS: Two thousand four hundred fourty one public and 15,589 private sector employees participated in a cross-sectional survey. Psychosocial work hazards, self-rated health (SRH), and burnout status were assessed by questionnaire.

RESULTS: As compared with private sector employees, public sector employees reported better psychosocial work conditions and better SRH, but higher risk of workplace violence (WPV) and higher levels of client-related burnout. Regression analyses indicated that higher psychosocial job demands, lower workplace justice, and WPV experience were associated with poor SRH and higher burnout. The public-private difference in client-related burnout remained even with adjustment of psychosocial work factors.

CONCLUSION: Greater risks of WPV and client-related burnout observed in public sector employees warrant further investigation.

Language: en