SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Harland KK, Bedford R, Wu H, Ramirez M. Traffic Injury Prev. 2018; 19(3): 230-234.

Affiliation

University of Iowa, College of Public Health , Department of Occupational and Environmental Health , 145 N. Riverside Dr 1008 CPHB, Iowa City , IA 52242 (at the time this work was completed) & University of Minnesota, School of Public Health, Division of Environmental Health Sciences , 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis , MN 55455-0341 (at time of submission).

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/15389588.2017.1407924

PMID

29211499

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of alcohol impairment in crashes involving farm equipment on public roadways and the effect of alcohol impairment on the odds of crash injury or fatality.

METHODS: On-road farm equipment crashes were collected from four Great Plains state Departments of Transportation during 2005-2010. Alcohol impairment was defined as an involved driver having blood alcohol content of ≥0.08 g/100 ml or a finding of alcohol-impaired as a driver contributing circumstance recorded on the police crash report. Injury or fatality was categorized as: a) no injury (no and possible injury combined), b) injury (non-incapacitating or incapacitating injury,) and c) fatality. Hierarchical multivariable logistic regression modeling, clustered on crash, was used to estimate the odds of an injury/fatality in crashes involving an alcohol-impaired driver.

RESULTS: During the five years under study, 3.1% (61 of 1971) of on-road farm equipment crashes involved an alcohol-impaired driver. One in twenty (5.6%) injury crashes and one in six (17.8%) fatality crashes involved an alcohol-impaired driver. The non-farm equipment driver was significantly more likely to be alcohol-impaired than the farm equipment driver (2.4% versus 1.1% respectively, p = 0.0012). After controlling for covariates, crashes involving an alcohol-impaired driver had 4.10 (95% CI: 2.30-7.28) times the odds of an injury or fatality. In addition, the non-farm vehicle driver was at 2.28 (95% CI: 1.92-2.71) times higher odds of an injury or fatality than the farm vehicle driver. No differences in rurality of the crash site were found in the multivariable model.

CONCLUSION: On-road farm equipment crashes involving alcohol result in greater odds of an injury or fatality. The risk of injury or fatality is higher among the non-farm equipment vehicle drivers who are also more likely to be alcohol-impaired. Further studies are needed to measure the impact of alcohol impairment in on-road farm equipment crashes.


Language: en

Keywords

Agricultural equipment; Driving under the influence; Occupational accident/injuries; Traffic accident

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print