SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Stemn E, Bofinger C, Cliff D, Hassall ME. Safety Sci. 2018; 101: 313-325.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.018

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

For effective and efficient learning to occur from safety incidents, certain factors and conditions related to the organisation, the actors or agents of learning, the learning process and the incidents themselves must be considered. Learning from incidents is not automatic and requires conscious and systematic steps to ensure it happens. Retaining the lessons learnt in the organisational memory to ensure continuous usage during the lifetime of the organisation is critical because personnel and learning agents change. To understand where breakdowns in learning from incidents are occurring, a bowtie analysis was used to organise the literature on failure to learn from safety incidents in a way that informs researchers and practitioners of priority areas. Additionally, the analysis aimed to test the validity of the bowtie method to filter failure to learn literature to identify key areas that could maximise learning. Using the bowtie analysis method led to the grouping of the issues identified in the literature on learning from safety incidents into three themes, namely, threats to failure to learn, consequences of failure to learn, and controls for overcoming failure to learn. This approach allows a summary representation of how and why failure to learn continues to occur together with potential practical strategies on how to overcome failure.


Language: en

Keywords

Learning; Bowtie analysis; Safety incident

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print