SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Liu YC, Ho CH. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2018; 53: 143-154.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.trf.2017.09.010

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the usability of the forward collision warning (FCW) system as adopted by the statistical quality control (SQC) chart design concepts on drivers' car following behaviors and task performance. A total of 48 highly aggressive and 48 less aggressive drivers participated in a two (aggressive driving: high vs. low; between-subjects) by two (driving workload: high vs. low; within-subjects) by three (the FCW system: five-stages vs. X-bar vs. X-bar plus exponentially weighted moving-average (EWMA) control charts; between-subjects) mixed-factorial simulation experiment. The drivers' behaviors, response time to divided attention (DA) tasks, as well as subjective workload and trust ratings were collected.

FINDINGS showed that drivers with the FCW's assistance improved their car-following behaviors and that the FCWs with the SQC chart design concepts showed better results than the five-stage system. Drivers who used both SQC FCWs performed correspondingly in their car-following behaviors. However, the X-bar FCW aided drivers in responding to DA tasks much faster, and drivers felt less stressed and had more trust in using the X-bar FCW system than those who used the X-bar + EWMA FCW system.


Language: en

Keywords

Aggressive driving; Car following; Driving simulator; Forward collision warning (FCW); Statistical quality control (SQC) chart; Usability

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print