SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Yang Y, Tokita M, Ishiguchi A. Iperception 2018; 9(1): e2041669517747297.

Affiliation

Faculty of Core Research, Ochanomizu University, Tokyo, Japan.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/2041669517747297

PMID

29399318

PMCID

PMC5788105

Abstract

A number of studies revealed that our visual system can extract different types of summary statistics, such as the mean and variance, from sets of items. Although the extraction of such summary statistics has been studied well in isolation, the relationship between these statistics remains unclear. In this study, we explored this issue using an individual differences approach. Observers viewed illustrations of strawberries and lollypops varying in size or orientation and performed four tasks in a within-subject design, namely mean and variance discrimination tasks with size and orientation domains. We found that the performances in the mean and variance discrimination tasks were not correlated with each other and demonstrated that extractions of the mean and variance are mediated by different representation mechanisms. In addition, we tested the relationship between performances in size and orientation domains for each summary statistic (i.e. mean and variance) and examined whether each summary statistic has distinct processes across perceptual domains. The results illustrated that statistical summary representations of size and orientation may share a common mechanism for representing the mean and possibly for representing variance. Introspections for each observer performing the tasks were also examined and discussed.


Language: en

Keywords

individual difference; mean; summary statistical representation; variance

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print