Citation

Vuillemin Q, Schwartzbrod PE, Pasquier P, Sibille F, Trousselard M, Ferrer MH. Mil. Med. 2018; 183(1-2): e95-e103.

Affiliation

Neurophysiology of Stress Unit, Neuroscience and Operational Constraint Department, French Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute-IRBA, 1 place Valérie André, 91223 Brétigny-sur-Orge, France.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Association of Military Surgeons of the United States)

DOI

10.1093/milmed/usx011

PMID

29401335

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Health care delivery in military conflicts implies high-stress environments. Hemorrhage is the first cause of survivable death among combat casualties, and tourniquet application is one of the most critical lifesaving interventions on the battlefield. However, previous studies have shown high failure rates in tourniquet application. Our study aimed to assess the correlation between personality traits that may interfere with effective tourniquet application in a simulated extremity hemorrhage. MATERIALS: Seventy-two French soldiers, previously trained to forward combat casualty care, were evaluated by self-administered questionnaires and submitted to the simulation in group of six. We focused on measuring the empathic personality of the subjects, their peer-to-peer relationships (altruism), as well as their relationship to themselves (mindfulness and self-esteem). The effectiveness of the tourniquet was evidenced by the interruption of the popliteal artery flow Doppler signal. A composite variable called "efficiency" was defined by elimination of popliteal pulse Doppler signal in less than 60 s.

RESULTS: Tourniquet application interrupted arterial flow in 37 participants (51.39%). Efficiency was obtained by 19 participants (26.39%). We observed that soldiers with high active altruism applied less-efficient tourniquet (odds ratio = 0.15; 95% confidence interval = 0.04-0.59). On the contrary, soldiers with high self-esteem scores applied more efficient tourniquet (odds ratio = 3.95; 95% confidence interval = 1.24-12.56). There was no significant difference concerning empathy and mindfulness scores.

CONCLUSION: Tourniquet application is technically simple but painful and may involve personal sensitivity. These initial findings highlight the necessity to further explore the psychological processes involved in lifesaving interventions. Self-esteem stands out as a real asset in terms of military competence and resilience, a major prerequisite in stressful situations. Changing altruistic motivations of soldiers is likely not desirable, but being aware of its potential effects may help to develop personal adaptive strategies and to optimize collective training.

Language: en