SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Yoganandan N, Banerjee A. J. Neurotrauma 2018; 35(11): 1272-1279.

Affiliation

Medical College of Wisconsin, 5506, Biostatistics, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States ; abanerjee@mcw.edu.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Mary Ann Liebert Publishers)

DOI

10.1089/neu.2017.5356

PMID

29409390

Abstract

Head contact-induced loads can result in skull fractures and/or brain injuries. While skull fractures have been produced from post mortem human cadaver surrogates (PMHS), injury probability curves describing their structural responses have not been developed. The objectives of this study were to develop skull fracture-based injury risk curves and describe human tolerances using survival analysis. Published PMHS data in this journal were used. Mean age, stature, and weight of 12 PMHS were: 66.6±2.3 years, 1.71±2.9 m, and 76.4±4.6 kg. A testing device applied contact loading to the head. Failure force, deflection, energy, and linear and secant stiffness variables were used to develop probability curves. Parametric survival analysis included identifying most optimal distribution, ensuring that the chosen distribution is not significantly different from the nonparametric model, determining ±95% confidence interval bounds and Normalized CI Sizes (NICS), obtaining quality indices for each risk curve, and determining their hierarchical sequence using the Brier score (TBS). Lognormal distribution was the most optimal distribution for all variables, except failure force, for which Weibull distribution was optimal. Tightness-of-fit of risk curves for failure force, energy, and deflection were better than linear and secant stiffness variables. Force best represented skull fracture response based on TBS and NCIS, followed by deflection and energy, while two stiffness variables were least preferred metrics. These structural response-based set of risk curves, hitherto not reported, form a fundamental dataset for validating/assessing accuracy of outputs from computational models and serve as hierarchical skull fracture injury criteria under head contact loads.


Language: en

Keywords

HEAD TRAUMA; IN VITRO STUDIES; MILITARY INJURY

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print