Citation

Zgoba KM. Am. J. Crim. Justice 2017; 42(3): 628-643.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, College of Law Enforcement, Eastern Kentucky University, Publisher Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s12103-016-9376-0

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Issues of sexual abuse, predation and rape have received an increased degree of attention over the last decade and as a result have overshadowed similarly offensive crimes. Various highly publicized cases of sexual violence against women and children have gripped both the United States and the United Kingdom and have resulted in the implementation of sexual violence laws. Media coverage of an 'epidemic' of sexual violence has led some to question whether the frenzy surrounding these publicized cases has created a "fear factor" among parents and caregivers, begging the question as to whether the incidence of sexual violence has increased or whether the heightened sensitivity is a result of increased media reporting. This article examines approximately 12 years of aggregate sexual abuse prevalence data (crimes reported to the police) in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, and compared prevalence change points and sexual offense law implementation. The article then examines the possible theory of whether Sarah's Law could potentially to be a result of increased fear or a moral panic.

FINDINGS indicate sex crime rates were declining prior to the law's implementation, lending cautious support to the proposition that the genesis of Sarah's Law may have been due to fear, rather than actual increases in sexual crimes.

Language: en