SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Cross SL, Charlton JL, Koppel S. J. Australas. Coll. Road Saf. 2017; 28(3): 43-54.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Australasian College of Road Safety)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to understand Australian parents' beliefs relating to child restraint system (CRS) use and child vehicle occupant safety. Three hundred and eighty parents completed an online survey related to CRS knowledge and their beliefs about which factors influence child vehicle occupant safety.

RESULTS revealed a wide variety in parents' beliefs relating to CRS use and child vehicle occupant safety. Parents tended to attribute the responsibility of child/ren's vehicle occupant safety to internal factors such as their own driving abilities (64%) and their own safety compliance (64%), rather than external factors (e.g., fate [7%]). The results of the current safety study suggests that there are still significant gaps in Australian parents' understanding about CRS use and child occupant safety which is important for the development and success of future child occupant safety initiatives.

Keywords: Child vehicle occupant safety, child restraint systems (CRS), CRS use, CRS misuse


Language: en

Keywords

Adults; Australia; Children; Education; Manual safety belts; Public opinion; Safe systems (road users); Seat (veh); Traffic safety education; Parents; Child restraint systems; Attitude (psychol); Road user education; Age; Parent; Liability; Responsibility; Child restraint

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print