Citation

Sun M, Xu N, Li C, Wu D, Zou J, Wang Y, Luo L, Yu M, Zhang Y, Wang H, Shi P, Chen Z, Wang J, Lu Y, Li Q, Wang X, Bi Z, Fan M, Fu L, Yu J, Hao M. BMC Public Health 2018; 18(1): e474.

Affiliation

Research Institute of Health Development Strategies & Collaborative Innovation Center of Social Risks Governance in Health, Fudan University, 177 box, 130 Dong'an Road, Shanghai, 200032, China. haomo03@fudan.edu.cn.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group - BMC)

DOI

10.1186/s12889-018-5284-1

PMID

29642902

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Public health emergencies have challenged the public health emergency management systems (PHEMSs) of many countries critically and frequently since this century. As the world's most populated country and the second biggest economy in the world, China used to have a fragile PHEMS; however, the government took forceful actions to build PHEMS after the 2003 SARS outbreak. After more than one decade's efforts, we tried to assess the improvements and problems of China's PHEMS between 2002 and 2012.

METHODS: We conducted two rounds of national surveys and collected the data of the year 2002 and 2012, including all 32 provincial, 139 municipal, and 489 county CDCs. The municipal and county CDCs were selected by systematic random sampling. Twenty-one indicators of four stages (preparation, readiness, response and recovery) from the National Assessment Criteria for CDC Performance were chosen to assess the ten-year trends.

RESULTS: At the preparation stage, organization, mechanisms, workforce, and stockpile across all levels and regions were significantly improved after one decade's efforts. At the readiness stage, the capability for formulating an emergency plan was also significantly improved during the same period. At the response stage, internet-based direct reporting was 98.8%, and coping scores were nearly full points of ten in 2012. At the recovery stage, the capabilities were generally lower than expected.

CONCLUSIONS: Due to forceful leadership, sounder regulations, and intensive resources, China's PHEMS has been improved at the preparation, readiness, and response stages; however, the recovery stage was still weak and could not meet the requirements of crisis management and preventive governance. In addition, CDCs in the Western region and counties lagged behind in performance on most indicators. Future priorities should include developing the recovery stage, establishing a closed feedback loop, and strengthening the capabilities of CDCs in Western region and counties.

Language: en

Keywords

China; Preparation; Public health emergency management system; Readiness; Recovery; Response; Trend