SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Ranney JM, Zuschlag M, Coplen M, Nelson C. Safety Sci. 2018; 107: 130-144.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.ssci.2017.06.010

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Human Factors Research and Development (R&D) Program sponsored a Clear Signal for Action (CSA) demonstration pilot to evaluate whether an approach that combines peer-to-peer feedback and continuous improvement methods can improve safety in the railroad industry, as it has in other industries. The Station Services Department, comprised of baggage handlers and other workers represented by the Transportation Communication Union (TCU) at Chicago's Amtrak Union Station, participated in the demonstration pilot. CSA was implemented by Behavioral Science Technology, Inc. (BST) over sixteen months (Phase 1) and seventeen more months (Phase 2), separated by a fourteen-month withdrawal due to downsizing. An independent evaluation of the project, conducted at the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, found the injury rate significantly decreased following employee training in Phase 2 on CSA methods. In both phases, the injury rate decreased significantly as the total number of peer-to-peer feedback sessions accumulated. The injury rate did not change during baseline or withdrawal. Interviews with Station Services employees suggested that, as a result of the greater employee involvement in safety, employees experienced an increased personal safety awareness and communication about safety.


Language: en

Keywords

Behavior-based safety; Behavioral observation; Continuous improvement; Feedback; Peer-to-peer feedback; Program evaluation; Risk reduction; Steering committee

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print