SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Saleme DM, Kluwe-Schiavon B, Soliman A, Misiak B, Frydecka D, Moustafa AA. Behav. Brain Res. 2018; 350: 23-30.

Affiliation

(a)School of Social Sciences and Psychology, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia; (f)Marcs Institute for Brain and Behaviour, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: a.moustafa@westernsydney.edu.au.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.bbr.2018.04.052

PMID

29778626

Abstract

Evidence suggests that factors influencing risk-taking include whether decisions are made based on emotions (affective systems) or cognitions (deliberative systems), the processing of feedback (e.g., deciding to attend a rehabilitation facility for opioid addiction treatment after an intervention held by a family member), and attention to environmental contingencies (e.g., considering the probability of an outcome such as the likelihood of contracting tetanus from a shared needle; or the gains and losses associated with a decision, such as the benefits and costs of taking drugs). Although drug-dependent individuals tend to take more risks than non-drug users, the factors underlying risk-taking are unknown. The current study tested, for the first time, the influences of performance feedback (i.e., whether feedback about performance is integrated into decision-making in heroin-dependent individuals) and attention to environmental contingencies (i.e., the influence of the probability of a loss, the gain amount, and the loss amount associated with a scenario) on risk-taking in heroin-dependent individuals. Heroin-dependent patients undergoing maintenance therapy for opioid addiction (n = 25) and healthy controls (n = 27) completed the feedback and no-feedback conditions of the Columbia Card Task (CCT). Analyses of covariance, controlling for education and task design (the order in which the CCT conditions were completed) as covariates revealed a significant interaction between (a) probability, gain and loss amount, and group, and (b) group and probability. Our findings suggest that heroin-dependent patients pay less attention to environmental contingencies during risk-taking than controls. Addressing these factors may facilitate greater adherence to treatment programs and lower rates of relapse.

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

environmental contingency; feedback; opiate dependence; risk taking

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print