SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Herzberg G, Galissard T, Burnier M. Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. 2018; 28(8): 1459-1463.

Affiliation

Wrist Surgery Unit, Herriot Hospital, 5 Place Arsonval, 69003, Lyon, France.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s00590-018-2225-8

PMID

29779194

Abstract

There is not enough evidence in the literature to support the use of any classification system for distal radius fractures (DRF) in adults. However, there is a need for identification of more homogeneous groups of patients with DRF so that the extent of preoperative workup and sophistication of treatment would best match the needs of the patient. The authors propose an innovative method to analyse and stratify acute DRF in adults. A one-page chart includes criteria related to the patient (P), the energy of the accident (A) and the pathology of the fracture (F). Analysis of the pathology includes not only the distal radius itself but also the associated ulnar and carpal lesions. Radiological suspicion of associated carpal of distal radio-ulnar joint ligamentous injuries is included in the analysis. The preliminary results of the use of this chart in 1610 consecutive adult patients (16-102 years) with unilateral acute DRF are presented. A total of six homogeneous groups of patients are described, and the relevance of this classification regarding the therapeutic options is discussed.


Language: en

Keywords

Classification; Distal radius fracture; Epidemiology

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print