SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Tamura Y, Xu X, Tanaka H, Kim YC, Yoshida A, Yang Q. Procedia Eng. 2017; 199: 28-37.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.146

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Recent super-tall building design has been released from the spell of compulsory symmetric shape design, and freestyle design is increasing. This is mainly due to architects' and structural designers' challenging demands for novel and unconventional expressions. Another important aspect is that rather complicated sectional shapes are basically good with regard to aerodynamic properties for cross-wind responses. A series of wind tunnel tests have been carried out to determine aerodynamic performance and pedestrian-level wind characteristics of many super-tall buildings with various configurations: square plan, rectangular plan, elliptic plan, with corner cut, with corner chamfered, tilted, tapered, inverse tapered, with setbacks, helical, openings and so on. Dynamic wind-induced response analyses of these models have also been conducted. The results of these tests have led to comprehensive discussions on the aerodynamic and pedestrian level wind characteristics of various tall building configurations.


Language: en

Keywords

helical shape; opening; pedestrian level wind; polygon plane; super-tall building; tapered shape; wind-induced response

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print