SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Lauer A, Zähle H. Insur. Math. Econ. 2017; 74: 99-108.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.insmatheco.2017.03.001

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

We consider two nonparametric estimators for the risk measure of the sum of n i.i.d. individual insurance risks divided by n, where the number of historical single claims that are used for the statistical estimation is of order n. This framework matches the situation that nonlife insurance companies are faced with within the scope of premium calculation. Indeed, the risk measure of the collective risk divided by n can be seen as a suitable premium for each of the individual risks. For both estimators asymptotic normality has been obtained recently. Here we derive almost sure bootstrap consistency for both estimators, where we allow for the weighted exchangeable bootstrap and rather general law-invariant risk measures. Both estimators are subject to a relevant negative bias for small to moderate n. For one of them we investigate by means of numerical experiments the benefit of a bootstrap-based bias correction. The numerical experiments are performed for the Value at Risk and the Average Value at Risk, and the results are comparable to those of Kim and Hardy (2007) who did analogous experiments for classical nonparametric plug-in estimators. For the other estimator the benefit of a bootstrap-based bias correction can be ruled out by theoretical arguments.


Language: en

Keywords

Average Value at Risk; Bootstrap consistency; Bootstrap-based bias correction; Collective risk; Law-invariant risk measure; Nonparametric estimation; Value at Risk; Weighted exchangeable bootstrap

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print