SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Op de Macks ZA, Flannery JE, Peake SJ, Flournoy JC, Mobasser A, Alberti SL, Fisher PA, Pfeifer JH. Neuroimage 2018; 181: 568-581.

Affiliation

Prevention Science Institute, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA. Electronic address: jpfeifer@uoregon.edu.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.058

PMID

29940284

Abstract

Changes across the span of adolescence in the adolescent reward system are thought to increase the tendency to take risks. While developmental differences in decision and outcome-related reward processes have been studied extensively, existing paradigms have largely neglected to measure how different types of decisions modulate reward-related outcome processes. We modified an existing decision-making paradigm (the Stoplight Task; Chein et al., 2011) to create a flexible laboratory measure of decision-making and outcome processing, including the ability to assess modulatory effects of safe versus risky decisions on reward-related outcome processes: the Yellow Light Game (YLG). We administered the YLG in the MRI scanner to 81 adolescents, ages 11-17 years, recruited from the community.

RESULTS showed that nucleus accumbens activation was enhanced for (1) risky > safe decisions, (2) positive > negative outcomes, and (3) outcomes following safe decisions compared to outcomes following risky decisions, regardless of whether these outcomes were positive or negative. Outcomes following risky decisions (compared to outcomes following safe decisions) were associated with enhanced activity in cortical midline structures. Furthermore, while there were no developmental differences in risk-taking behavior, more pubertally mature adolescents showed enhanced nucleus accumbens activation during positive > negative outcomes. These findings suggest that outcome processing is modulated by the types of decisions made by adolescents and highlight the importance of investigating processes involved in safe as well as risky decisions to better understand the adolescent tendency to take risks.

Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.


Language: en

Keywords

Adolescence; Driving game; Reward; Risk taking; Ventral striatum; fMRI

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print