Citation

Kovar CL. MCN Am. J. Matern. Child Nurs. 2018; 43(4): 213-217.

Affiliation

Cheryl L. Kovar is an Assistant Professor, East Carolina University, College of Nursing, Greenville, NC. The author can be reached via e-mail at kovarc15@ecu.edu.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

10.1097/NMC.0000000000000435

PMID

29958204

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Reproductive coercion involves behavior that interferes with the individual's unique ability to make decisions about their reproductive health. The concept was first recognized in 2010. Reproductive coercion is intended to maintain power and control in a relationship by someone past, present, or future wishing to be involved in an intimate or dating relationship with an adult or adolescent. Three forms of coercion have been identified: contraceptive sabotage, pregnancy pressure, and control of pregnancy outcomes.

METHODS: A search for scientific literature was conducted examining studies involving reproductive coercion as well as evidence-based interventions that could be used by nurses in the clinic setting.

CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of reproductive coercion is estimated to range from 8% to 16%. There is a high association between intimate partner violence (IPV), sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and unintended pregnancy. Adolescents are at greater risk for reproductive coercion than older women. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: There are interventions we can incorporate into our clinical practices to screen and assess women for reproductive coercion. Women experiencing reproductive coercion are at risk for unintended pregnancy, STIs, IPV, and forced pregnancy outcomes.

Language: en