Citation

Swan RS, Bates KA. Contemp. Justice Rev. 2017; 20(1): 132-153.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/10282580.2016.1262774

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Civil gang injunctions (CGIs) are court-ordered restraining orders that are being utilized in the name of controlling the daily routine of alleged gang members, reducing crime, and eliminating 'public nuisances' in working-class neighborhoods of color. In this study, we draw upon interviews and court observations conducted between 2009 and 2014 in San Diego County to examine the perceptions of a subset of those who have been listed on CGIs or other gang suppression methods, and those who work closely with them, about their individual and collective impacts. We find that the men and women in our study experience several hidden harms of gang enforcement measures that damage their ability to connect with others in the community, including their own family members and friends; and reduce their ability to pursue opportunities related to education, housing, and employment. We demonstrate that the loss of these bonds to community and opportunities, leads to perceptions of injustice and, in some instances, a transformation in gang activity, rather than its elimination. Ultimately, these exploratory findings raise questions about the logic and justice of gang suppression.

Language: en

Keywords

Civil gang injunctions; impact of gang suppression; social bonds