SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Gu GZ, Yu SF, Zhou WH, Wu H, Kang L, Chen R. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi 2018; 36(4): 260-263.

Affiliation

Henan Provincial Institute for Occupational Health,Zhengzhou 450052,China.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Tianjin shi lao dong wei sheng yan jiu suo)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

29996245

Abstract

Objective: To investigate self-esteem status of train drivers. Methods: By using cluster sampling method, a cross-sectional study was conducted in 1 413 train drivers (including passenger train drivers 301, freight train drivers683, passenger shunting train drivers350, and high speed train drivers79) from a railway bureau. The occupational stressors, strains, self-esteem and personalities were measured using occupational stress instruments and effort-reward imbalance questionnaire. Results: The level of self-esteem is medium ofthe train drivers. Sself-esteem scores among different among different job category (job title) , marry status, age, length of service groups were statistical significance (P<0.01). Differences of self-esteem among different educational level, exercise, smoking and drinking groups weren't statistical significance (P>0.05). Correlation analysis revealed that self-esteem score was related positively to job satisfaction (r=0.300) , reward (r=0.842) , working stability (r=0.243) , promotion opportunities (r=0.493) , positive affectivity (r=0.216) , responsibility for human beings (r=0.112) and responsibility for things scores (r=0.108) (P<0.01) , negatively to sleep quality (r=-0.103) , social support (r=-0.212) , role conflict (r=-0.007) , role ambiguity (r=-0.169) , physiological needs (r=-0.115) , daily stress (r=-0.150) , negative affectivity (r=-0.252) , depressive symptoms scores (r=-0.215) (P<0.01). Nonparametric test found that train drivers of group with low self-esteem score reported higher scores for physiological need, role conflict, role ambiguity, social sleep quality, depressive symptoms, negative affectivity, social support and daily stress scores than the medium and higher groups (P<0.01 or<0.05). But reword, job satisfaction, positive affectivity, copping stratgy, working stability and promotion opportunities scores were lower than the group of medium and higher groups (P<0.01). Inter-group conflict scores were insignificance (P>0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that low low self-esteem for drivers occured the risk of job dissatisfaction about 1.5 times as high as that of drivers with higher self-esteem (OR=1.476) Conclusion: Different types of locomotive drivers get different level of self-esteem. Self-esteem was affected by occupational stress largely.


Language: zh




目的: 探讨机车司机的自尊感及其影响因素。 方法: 采取整群抽样的方法,于2012年3月,对某铁路局机务段1 413名男性机车司机(客车司机301名、货车司机683名、运调车司机350名动车或高铁司机79名)进行了横断面调查。调查内容包括用职业紧张测量工具、工作内容问卷和付出-回报失衡问卷测试机车司机的职业应激因素、应激反应、自尊感等个体特征。 结果: 不同类型的机车司机、婚姻状况、年龄、工龄组间自尊感评分的差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);自尊感评分与工作满意感、回报、工作稳定性、提升机会、正性情感、对人的责任和对事的责任的评分呈正相关(P<0.01),与睡眠障碍、社会支持、角色冲突、角色模糊、生理需求、每日紧张感、负性情感和抑郁症状的评分呈负相关(P<0.01)。非参数检验显示,低评分自尊感组的生理需求、角色冲突、角色模糊、睡眠障碍、抑郁症状、负性情感、社会支持和每日紧张感评分高于高评分、中等评分自尊感两组(P<0.01,P<0.05);而回报、工作满意感、正性情感、应对策略、工作稳定性、提升机会评分低于高评分、中等评分自尊感两组(P<0.01);多因素Logistic回归分析显示,低自尊感发生工作不满意的风险约是高自尊感发生工作不满意风险的1.5倍(OR=1.476)。 结论: 驾驶不同类型的机车司机自尊感有差异,职业应激对自尊感有较大影响。.


Language: zh

Keywords

Occupational stress; Personal feature; Self-esteem; Train drivers

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print