Citation

Thompson OF, Galea ER, Hulse LM. Safety Sci. 2018; 109: 303-312.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.ssci.2018.06.016

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Most fire-related injuries and fatalities in the UK, and other parts of the world, continue to occur during fires in the home - incidents where it is acknowledged that human factors play a contributing role. Yet the field of fire safety lacks an up-to-date review of the literature on human behaviour during fires in domestic spaces. Given there is now a growing body of work looking at human behaviour in dwelling fires, a review of the literature in this area is timely. Drawing from published studies, this paper sets out what is currently known about human behaviour in dwelling fires and highlights the differences that appear to exist between these spaces and what is known and accepted about human behaviour in public, commercial and industrial spaces. This paper then goes on to consider the nature of "fire risk", arguing that much of the work in this area continues to conflate, or fails to recognise the existence of, different types of risk profiles, instead considering fire risk as a single type of risk, based mainly on factors related to fatalities. However, research findings point towards fire risk as at least three separate forms: the risk of a fire occurring, the risk of fire injury and the risk of fire fatality. By drawing together the literature on human behaviour in dwelling fires this paper argues that those who survive dwelling fires cannot be considered as "near miss fatalities", but instead must be treated as a separate and distinct group.

Language: en

Keywords

Domestic fire; Dwelling fire; Fire fatality; Fire incidence; Fire injury; Fire mortality; Fire risk; Human behaviour in fire