SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Crabtree A, Latham N, Morgan R, Pauly B, Bungay V, Buxton JA. Int. J. Drug Policy 2018; 59: 85-93.

Affiliation

School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 E Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada; British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, 655 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4, Canada.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.06.020

PMID

30071398

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been increasing interest in harm reduction initiatives for street-involved people who drink alcohol, including non-beverage alcohol such as mouthwash and hand sanitizer. Limited evidence exists to guide these initiatives, and a particular gap is in research that prioritizes the experiences and perspectives of drinkers themselves. This research was conducted to explore the harms of what participants termed "illicit drinking" as perceived by people who engage in it, to characterize the steps this population takes to reduce harms, and to identify additional interventions that may be of benefit.

METHODS: This participatory qualitative research drew on ethnographic approaches including a series of 14″town hall"-style meetings facilitatied and attended by people who self identify as drinking illicit or non-beverage alcohol (n = 60) in Vancouver, British Columbia. This fieldwork was supplemented with four focus groups to explore emerging issues.

RESULTS: Participants in the meetings described the harms they experienced as including unintentional injury; harms to physical health; withdrawal; violence, theft, and being taken advantage of; harms to mental health; reduced access to services; and interactions with police. Current harm reduction strategies involved balancing the risks and benefits of drinking in groups and adopting techniques to avoid withdrawal. Proposed future initiatives included non-residential managed alcohol programs and peer-based supports.

CONCLUSIONS: Illicit drinkers describe harms and harm reductions strategies that have much in common with those of other illicit substances, and can be interpreted as examples of and responses to structural and everyday violence. Understanding the perceived harms of alcohol use by socially marginalized drinkers and their ideas about harm reduction will help tailor programs to meet their needs.

Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

Ethnography; Harm reduction; Illicit alcohol; Non-beverage alcohol; Surrogate alcohol

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print