SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Abel GG, Jordan A, Harlow N, Hsu YS. Sex. Abuse 2019; 31(6): 662-683.

Affiliation

Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/1079063218793634

PMID

30112969

Abstract

Approximately 10% of children and adolescents are sexually abused by adults caring for them outside the home. The current study tested the validity and reliability of a child protection screen to identify job applicants who pose a sexual risk to children. The screen uses three separate measures. In combination, they attempt to identify two types of sexually problematic job applicants: hidden abusers and people with cognitive distortions that encourage child sexual boundary violations by themselves or tolerate them by others. The high specificity (97.8% for males and 98.7% for females) favored the high number of job applicants and volunteers who have not crossed sexual boundaries with children. The study included over 19,000 participants, and the screen correctly identified 77% of the men and over 72% of the women who posed a sexual risk. The test-retest correlation was statistically significant at r(121) =.83, and the screening methodology is valid and reliable. By identifying most of the job applicants who are hiding their history of sexually abusing a child or hiding their belief that adult-child sex causes no harm from the organizations they are attempting to join, this new preemployment screen methodology can help child-centered organizations protect children and adolescents in their care.


Language: en

Keywords

adolescent abuse; child abuse; child sexual abuse prevention; child sexual abusers; preemployment screening

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print