Citation

Huang PH. J. Med. Philos. 2018; 43(5): 547-567.

Affiliation

Monash University, Victoria, Australia.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Society for Health and Human Values, Publisher University of Chicago Press)

DOI

10.1093/jmp/jhy023

PMID

30189037

Abstract

John Harris recently argued that the moral bioenhancement proposed by Persson and Savulescu can damage moral agency by depriving recipients of their freedom to fall (freedom to make wrongful choices) and therefore should not be pursued. The link Harris makes between moral agency and the freedom to fall, however, implies that all forms of moral enhancement that aim to make the enhancement recipients less likely to "fall," including moral education, are detrimental to moral agency. In this article, I present a new moral agency-based critique against the moral bioenhancement program envisaged by Persson and Savulescu. I argue that the irresistible influences exerted by the bioenhancement program harm our capabilities for conducting accurate self-reflection and forming decisions that truly express our will, subsequently undermining our moral agency.

Language: en