CONTACT US: Contact info
|
Citation |
Knaappila N, Marttunen M, Fröjd S, Lindberg N, Kaltiala-Heino R. Child Abuse Negl. 2018; 86: 100-108. |
|
Affiliation |
Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, 33014 University of Tampere, Finland; Vanha Vaasa Hospital, Vierinkiventie 1, 65380, Vaasa, Finland; Tampere University Hospital, Department of Adolescent Psychiatry, 33380, Pitkäniemi, Finland. Electronic address: riittakerttu.kaltiala-heino@uta.fi. |
|
Copyright |
(Copyright © 2018, Elsevier Publishing) |
|
DOI |
|
PMID |
30273813 |
|
Abstract |
Bullying at school has far-reaching impacts on adolescent well-being and health. The aim of this study was to examine trends in bullying at school according to socioeconomic adversities among Finnish adolescents from 2000 to 2015. A population-based school survey was conducted biennially among 14-16-year-old Finns between 2000 and 2015 (n = 761,278). Distributions for bullying, being bullied and socioeconomic adversities were calculated. Associations between bullying involvement, time and socioeconomic adversities were studied using binomial logistic regression with results shown by odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. At the population level, the likelihoods of bullying and being bullied varied only slightly between 2000 and 2015. Bullying and being bullied were associated with socioeconomic adversities (low parental education, not living with both parents and parental unemployment in the past year). Unlike in the general population, the likelihoods of bullying and being bullied increased markedly among adolescents with most socioeconomic adversities. The increased socioeconomic differences in bullying involvement observed in this study add to the mounting evidence of polarization of adolescent health and well-being. Socioeconomic adversities should be considered in the prevention of bullying at school. In addition, socio-political measures are needed to decrease socioeconomic inequalities among Finnish adolescents. Language: en |
|
Keywords |
Adolescent; Bullying; Epidemiology; Population surveillance; Schools; Socioeconomic factors; Surveys and questionnaires |