SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Compare M, Zio E, Moroni E, Portinari G, Zanini T. Safety Sci. 2018; 110: 13-28.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.ssci.2018.07.027

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

SO/TR 14121-2: 2012 considers three factors to describe the likelihood of the occurrence of an incident scenario: the frequency of exposure of persons to the hazard, the probability of occurrence of the hazardous event and the technical and human possibilities of avoiding harm. The assessment of these factors can be quite controversial, especially when it concerns the amount of risk removable by protective measures: their mapping onto the risk factors is not always clear and this can lead to non-conservative over-estimations of the risk reduction. We propose a methodological framework compliant with ISO 12100 to systemically carry out repeatable risk analyses in support to the design of industrial machinery in which protective measures can be introduced to reduce risk. The methodology first proposes a scheme for identifying the contribution of PMs to the reduction of risk in a machinery under design. Then, the methodology classifies the protective measures and builds a clear mapping between these classes and the risk factors they impact on. This helps decision makers to identify the protective measures guaranteeing that the residual risk is acceptable. The methodology is applied to a real case study concerning a curing machine for tyre vulcanization, where it has proven to be beneficial for the clarity of the analysis and its repeatability.


Language: en

Keywords

ISO 12100: 2010; ISO/TR 14121-2: 2012; Protective measures; Risk assessment; Risk reduction

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print