Citation

Harrison K, Gill AK. J. Sex. Aggress. 2017; 23(3): 300-311.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/13552600.2016.1267271

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This article examines R v Jamal Muhammed Raheem Ul Nasir, a Court of Appeal case where leave to appeal against a seven-year custodial sentence for sexual offences against children was refused. The appellant argued that his sentence length was excessive because the judge viewed the female victims' ethnic and religious origin as an aggravating factor. In light of a number of charities' condemning the judgment, this article evaluates whether the Court of Appeal made the correct decision, particularly in the wider context of sentencing principles. It also considers whether causing shame to a victim and her family can be regarded as an aggravating factor when sentencing sexual offences, and discusses the circumstances where the victim's ethnic origin should be taken into account.

Language: en

Keywords

aggravating factors; sentencing principles; Shame; South Asian victims