|
Affiliation
|
Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Pain Medicine, Klinikum Gütersloh gGmbH, Academic Hospital, Gütersloh, Germany. |
|
Abstract
|
BACKGROUND: Vehicle extrication of crash victims is a highly-demanding challenge, due to the frequently life-threatening injuries of entrapped occupants. In this phase, crash victims are often exposed to the outdoor-temperature, with the risk of sustained hypothermia. Hypothermia can significantly raise the morbidity and mortality rates of crash victims. Therefore, we have correlated the incidence of severe car accidents with entrapped patients, the outdoor conditions, and expenditure of time for extrication. Furthermore, different warming strategies have been evaluated regarding their integrability within the rescue procedure.
METHODS: To estimate the incidence of severe car accidents with entrapped patients, we performed retrospective data mining for the cold season of a three-year period in a rural district in Germany. We evaluated the integrability of a chemical heated blanket, its combined application with a forced-air warmer, or with an infrared radiator for patient warming. Therefore, we analysed the time tracking of extrication reference points during extrication exercises undertaken by the rescue services, simulating a severe vehicle accident and evaluated questionnaires administered to rescue personnel and subjects. Furthermore, we monitored subjects' physiologic parameters to estimate the warming effect.
RESULTS: Incidence analysis resulted in extrication times of up to 80 min, representing two severely-entrapped patients per month in the cold seasons, corresponding to about four entrapments per 100.000 inhabitants every year. Of the different warming strategies analysed, the chemical blanket and the combination infrared radiator/chemical blanket were favoured regarding the items 'operator convenience', 'weight/size/handling', 'stability in positioning', 'time needed for installation', 'manpower requirement', 'hindrance during extrication operation', 'versality during extrication process', and 'robustness' by the rescue personnel; the forced-air warmer and the infrared radiator were preferred with regard to 'warming effect', the forced-air warmer and the chemical blanket was advantageous with regard to 'physical protection'.
CONCLUSIONS: Vehicle extrication procedures are time consuming, a relevant finding that provides a rationale for discussing and optimising the rescue procedure to prevent sustained hypothermia. We determined that combined application of an infrared radiator and a chemical blanket is advantageous in terms of integration into the rescue process. However, a more detailed investigation, focussing on warming efficacy, must be performed.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Language: en |