SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Cai Z, Xia Y, Bao Z, Mao H. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2019; 22(2): 169-179.

Affiliation

Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering and School of Biomedical Engineering , Western University , London , ON , Canada.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/10255842.2018.1541983

PMID

30582366

Abstract

To better understand head injuries, human head finite element (FE) models have been reported in the literature. In scenarios where the head is directly impacted and measurements of head accelerations are not available, a high-quality skull model, as well as a high-quality brain model, is needed to predict the effect of impact on the brain through the skull. Furthermore, predicting cranial bone fractures requires comprehensively validated skull models. Lastly, high-quality meshes for both the skull and brain are needed for accurate strain/stress predictions across the entire head. Hence, we adopted a multi-block approach to develop hexahedral meshes for the brain, skull, and scalp simultaneously, a first approach in its kind. We then validated our model against experimental data of brain pressures (Nahum et al., 1977 ) and comprehensive skull responses (Yoganandan et al., 1995 , Yoganandan et al., 2004 , and Raymond et al., 2009 ). We concluded that a human head FE model was developed with capabilities to predict blunt- and ballistic-impact-induced skull fractures and pressure-related brain injuries.


Language: en

Keywords

brain pressure; finite element modeling; human head injury; multi-block approach; skull response

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print