Citation

Pfeuffer CU, Pfister R, Foerster A, Stecher F, Kiesel A. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2019; 45(2): 157-173.

Affiliation

Cognition, Action, and Sustainability Unit, Department of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, American Psychological Association)

DOI

10.1037/xhp0000600

PMID

30589354

Abstract

Telling a consistent lie across multiple occasions poses severe demands on memory. Two cognitive mechanisms aid with overcoming this difficulty: associations between a question and its corresponding response and associations between a question and its previous intentional context (in this case: honest vs. dishonest responding). Here, we assessed whether intentional contexts such as an honest versus dishonest mindset modulate the retrieval of stimulus-response associations. In an item-specific priming paradigm, participants classified stimuli either honestly or dishonestly during a prime and a later probe. The results of three experiments yielded automatic retrieval of the previously primed motor responses (for both honest and dishonest responses) only when the intentional context repeated but not when it switched. These findings indicate interdependent associations between a stimulus, its intentional context, and the corresponding response, allowing for flexible, context-specific retrieval. Thus, humans benefit from prior learning history without incurring costs when the intentional context changes. This finding implies top-down control over the retrieval of stimulus-response associations and provides new insights into the mechanisms of associative learning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Language: en