SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Halpern-Meekin S, Costanzo M, Ehrenthal D, Rhoades G. Matern. Child Health J. 2019; 23(6): 756-767.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, University of Denver, 2155 S Race Street, Denver, CO, 80208, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s10995-018-2692-x

PMID

30600519

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To measure the proportion of women screened for IPV during prenatal care; to assess the predictors of prenatal IPV screening.

METHODS We use the CDC's 2012 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, representative of births in 24 states and New York City (Nā€‰=ā€‰28,581). We calculated descriptive and logistic regressions, weighted to deal with state-clustered observations.

RESULTS 49.2% of women in our sample reported being screened for IPV while pregnant. There were higher screening rates among women of color, and those who had not completed high school, never been married, received WIC benefits, initiated prenatal care in the first trimester, and were publicly insured. State screening rates varied (29.9-62.9%). Among states, mandated perinatal depression screening or training was positively associated with IPV screening. 3.6% of women in our sample reported prenatal IPV but were not screened during pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS for Practice Current efforts have not led to universal screening. We need to better understand when and why providers do not screen pregnant patients for IPV.


Language: en

Keywords

Intimate partner violence; Prenatal care; Screening; State policy

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print