SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Jetelina KK, Reingle Gonzalez JM, Cuccaro PM, Peskin MF, Pompeii L, Atem F, Elliott MN, Earnshaw VA, Davies SL, Schuster MA. J. Adolesc. Health 2019; 64(5): 664-670.

Affiliation

Kaiser Permanente School of Medicine, Pasadena, California.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.10.295

PMID

30612808

Abstract

PURPOSE: This article aims to (1) evaluate whether bullying typology predicts violent injury; (2) longitudinally examine whether violent injury trajectories differ across bullying typology as children age; and (3) longitudinally determine whether children who consistently reported perpetration or victimization (i.e., reported bullying at fifth, seventh, and 10th grade) were different from children who inconsistently reported perpetration or victimization.

METHODS: Longitudinal data were obtained from 4,297 children at three waves (fifth, seventh, and 10th grade) in three United States communities. Children were categorized into four mutually exclusive bullying typologies: neither victim nor perpetrator; victim only; perpetrator only; victim-perpetrator. Children self-reported mechanisms of violent injuries that needed medical attention in the past year. Regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between bullying group and the likelihood of violent injury over time.

RESULTS: Seventeen percent (n=857) of children in fifth grade reported a violent injury. Prevalence of overall violent injuries, and specifically firearm and knife injuries, increased over time. Children who reported perpetration in the absence of victimization were at increased odds for violent injury (adjusted odds ratio = 1.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.24, 1.60) compared with children who reported neither victimization nor perpetration, while children who reported victimization in the absence of perpetration were at decreased odds (adjusted odds ratio=.84, 95% confidence interval:.73,.97). A significant linear dose-response relationship was observed between duration of bullying perpetration and violent injury.

CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between bullying perpetration and violent injury over time was strong. Future research should investigate potential mediating behaviors, such as weapon access, which might explain the observed relationship.

Copyright © 2018 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

Bullying; Injury; Perpetration; Victimization; Violent

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print