SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Hash JB, Oxford ML, Fleming CB, Ward TM, Spieker SJ, Lohr MJ. Child Abuse Negl. 2019; 89: 143-154.

Affiliation

Department of Family & Child Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.12.016

PMID

30665020

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adversity may negatively impact young children's sleep but receiving home visitation services could buffer children from this potential consequence of adversity.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether young children's adverse experiences increased their risk for sleep problems and if Promoting First Relationships® (PFR), a home visitation program, reduced children's risk for sleep problems both directly and indirectly through increased parenting sensitivity. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Participants were 247 parents and their 10- to 24-month-old child recruited from Child Protective Services offices.

METHODS: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial comparing PFR to a resource and referral control condition was conducted. Four time points of data were collected from baseline to 6 months post-intervention. Parenting sensitivity was measured at all time points using a parent-child interaction tool. Children's adversities were measured at various time points using caregiver report tools and official state records. Children's sleep problems were reported by parents at 6 months post-intervention.

RESULTS: The likelihood of having a sleep problem increased as children's adversities increased (β = .23, SE =.08, p =.005). There was no effect (direct or indirect) of treatment assignment on children's sleep problems (ps >.05). Post hoc analyses showed a treatment assignment by adversity interaction such that children's odds of having a sleep problem increased as their adversities increased, but only among children in the control condition (b = -0.37, SE = 0.17, p =.030).

CONCLUSIONS: Experiencing more adversities associated with a greater risk for sleep problems, but PFR buffered children from this risk.

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

Adversity; Child protective services; Home visiting; Parental sensitivity; Sleep problems; Young children

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print