SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Dewar R. Transp. Res. Rec. 1988; 1160: 1-6.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1988, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences USA, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Several criteria for traffic sign symbols were examined through a questionnaire survey that allowed determination of the importance, or weighting, that should be assigned to each symbol in the design and evaluation of signs. The survey sample included traffic sign experts (members of national traffic control device committees) and practicing traffic engineers from Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and the United States. Separate ratings were assembled for symbols in general and for warning, regulatory, and information symbols in particular. Understandability was the factor rated most important, with conspicuity second. Learnability was considered least important, while reaction time, legibility distance, and glance legibility were rated equally but were determined to be more important than learnability.

Record URL:
http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1988/1160/1160-001.pdf


Language: en

Keywords

Traffic Signs, Signals and Markings; Transportation--Traffic Control; Codes, Symbolic

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print